Why the study?
Do novel oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) provide a safe and effective alternative to standard anticoagulation in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Do novel oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) provide a safe and effective alternative to standard anticoagulation in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran may offer convenient and effective alternatives to warfarin for long-term anticoagulation in acute coronary syndrome.
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) cause cessation of myocardial blood flow leading to coronary ischemia. The standard medical treatment includes heparin or low molecular weight heparin in the hospital, antiplatelet agents in the hospital and long term, and occasionally warfarin long term. All of these therapies are associated with bleeding complications. Furthermore, warfarin, with its narrow therapeutic window and need for frequent laboratory monitoring, poses several disadvantages. The development of novel oral factor Xa inhibitors and oral direct thrombin inhibitors may provide an alternative to warfarin. In this review, we discuss the new agents, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, for the potential treatment of ACS. We also review the relevant clinical trials evaluating their effects in ACS. These novel anticoagulants allow convenience of use with no requirement for laboratory monitoring and limited drug interactions, which may provide multifaceted treatment options for ACS and anticoagulation in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kar et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: