Why the study?
Do novel oral anticoagulants added to dual antiplatelet therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Do novel oral anticoagulants added to dual antiplatelet therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of NOACs in acute coronary syndrome is currently limited by increased bleeding risks when combined with standard dual antiplatelet therapy, though ongoing studies may clarify their role.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a cardiovascular condition with a multifactorial pathophysiology that includes atherosclerotic plaques, platelet activation and thrombin production, among others. Thrombin production and the prothrombotic state of ACS patients have provided a role for anticoagulants to treat patients during the acute event and has led to subsequent research for the post-acute state. Warfarin has an indication for ACS, however, it is restricted to specific patients and many factors limit its use. Therefore, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being explored for ACS. Limitations for the use of NOACs in ACS are centered on the increased risk of bleeding that occurs when these agents are added to the current standard of care with dual antiplatelet therapy. Rivaroxaban is the only NOAC that has achieved approval in Europe for this indication with none of the NOAC currently approved in the US for use in ACS. Ongoing studies for rivaroxaban and apixaban may provide evidence to further clarify the place in therapy for NOAC agents in ACS management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: