There is limited information regarding orthopaedic injuries in dressage horses. This study assessed the prevalence of injuries in a mixed referral and first opinion population of 272 horses training and competing in dressage, 238 of which were followed up one to five years after injury. Warmblood (55.8%) and Iberian (38.6%) breeds predominated. The median age was 8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 5,11; range 1,21). Horses were examined due to lameness (85.3%) or poor performance (14.7%). The median lameness grade was 2/5 (IQR 2,4; range 0,4). Forelimb lameness was more prevalent than hindlimb lameness (p < 0.001). Unilateral lameness (55.2%) was more common than multilimbed lameness (44.9%). Hypermetria (14.3%), hypermetria and weakness (2.2%) or weakness alone (1.1%) did not affect follow-up outcome compared with horses without neurological gait dysfunction. Soft tissue injuries were more common in Iberian horses than in Warmbloods (p = 0.006), but considering all injuries there was no difference in outcome between breeds. Injury type (soft tissue, osseous, osteoarthritis, developmental disease) did not influence follow-up outcome. Following targeted treatment and tailored rehabilitation programs, 42% of 238 horses returned to the same level of work as pre-injury or higher, 45% returned to work at a lower level and 13% were retired due to orthopaedic injury. In-depth clinical assessment and diagnostic anaesthesia are important for the identification of all problems and development of the most appropriate treatment and management protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boado et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: