Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lewis acid–base reactions between [{Pt(PPH3)2(µ-S)}2] and [{Cu(NO3)(µ-dppf)}2]–NH4PF6[dppf = Fe(C5H4PPh2)2] and [PtCl2(NCMe)2] gave hexanuclear [{Pt2(PPh3)4(µ3-S)2Cu}2(µ-dppf)][PF6]2 and trinuclear [{Pt(PPh3)2(µ3-S)}2PtCl2] respectively. X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) studies of these sulfur aggregates were made together with other known alkylated complexes [Pt2(PPh3)4(µ-S)(µ-SR)]X (R = Me, X = 1; R = CH2Cl, X = Cl; R = CHCl2, X = PF6; R = CH2Ph, X = PF6) and metallated complexes [{Pt2(PPh3)4(µ-S)2}xML]n+nX–[M = Ni, L = Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2(dppe), X = PF6, x= 1; M = Pd2, L =(µ-Cl)2, X = PF6, x= 2; M = Ag2, X = NO3, x= 2; M = Au, L = PPh3, X = PF6, x= 1; M = Hg, X = PF6, x= 2; M = Hg, L = dppe, X = PF6, x= 1; n= 2 for all M except Au where n= 1]. The observed binding energies are related to the charge distribution and nucleophilicity of the sulfur centres. The possibility of using multinuclear XPS [S(2p), P(2p), Cl(2p), Pt(4f)] to distinguish chemically inequivalent nuclei is examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aw et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: