Why the study?
What is the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing CABG for chronic stable angina, and what are the most appropriate diagnostic techniques?
What is the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing CABG for chronic stable angina, and what are the most appropriate diagnostic techniques?
In patients undergoing CABG, perioperative MI occurs in about 14% of cases and is more accurately diagnosed by myocardial scanning and routine cardiac enzymes than by ECG.
Fifty consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic stable angina were assessed by serial electrocardiography, preoperative and postoperative myocardial scanning with technetium-99m pyrophosphate, gated radionuclide ventriculography, and serial measurement of creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, urea stable lactic dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase isoenzyme (MB) to assess the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction and identify the most appropriate diagnostic techniques. The correlation between myocardial scanning and the measurement of peak enzyme and isoenzyme activity was excellent in the diagnosis of perioperative infarction, although electrocardiography proved less helpful. There appeared to be no advantage in measuring creatine kinase MB rather than the more routinely measured enzymes. There were two deaths and evidence of myocardial infarction in five other patients, an incidence of 14%. Perioperative infarction was associated with a significant reduction in resting ejection fraction in two cases. In those patients without evidence of perioperative infarction the mean increase in ejection fraction of 7.8% was statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGregor et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: