Why the study?
Should critically ill patients undergo procedures at bedside in the ICU or in the operating room?
Should critically ill patients undergo procedures at bedside in the ICU or in the operating room?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary debates the pros and cons of performing urgent procedures on critically ill patients at the bedside in the ICU versus transporting them to the operating room.
Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) is a fast-growing field in anesthesiology, wherein anesthesia care is provided for surgical procedures performed outside the main operating room (OR) pavilion. Advances in medical science and technology have led to an increasing number of procedures being moved out of the operating room to procedural suites. One such NORA location is the intensive care unit (ICU), where a growing number of urgent and emergent procedures are being performed on medically unstable patients. ICU-NORA allows medical care to be provided to patients who are too sick to tolerate transport between the ICU and the OR. However, offering the same, high-quality, and safe care in this setting may be challenging. It requires special planning and a thorough consideration of the presence of life-threatening comorbidities and location-specific and ergonomic barriers. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss these special considerations and argue in favor of and against routinely performing procedures at the bedside in the ICU versus in the OR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karamchandani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: