This study focus to see how influence circle employee millennial on work life balance, job embeddedness, organizational commitment and turnover intention.Study this aim for identify , analyze and understand and what only affect employee turnover intention millennials at Islamic Banks in the DKI Jakarta, West Java , and Banten Regions.Study this examine the work life balance and job embeddedness variables through organizational commitment to employee turnover intention millennial .population used _ is employees of Islamic Banks in West Java , Banten and DKI Jakarta.Selection made _ sample with a total of 280 people .In study this there are 280 employees millennials at Sharia Banks in the DKI Jakarta, West Java , and Banten Regions as population research .Analysis result as well as discussion that has been conducted could spelled out as following : Work Life Balance to Turnover Intention has influence Negative with score sample original of -0.378 but influence second variable the considered Significant because because statistic T value more big from t -table (3.378 < 1.991) or could said hypothesis accepted .Job Embeddedness to Turnover Intention has influence negative with score sample original of -0.040 and the effect of second variable the considered no significant because because statistic T value more small from t -table (0.361 < 1.991) or could said hypothesis rejected .Work Life Balance to Organizational Commitment has influence positive with score sample original of 0.328 and the effect of second variable the considered significantbecause because statistic T value more big from t -table (3,496 > 1.991) or could said hypothesis accepted .Job Embeddedness to Organizational Commitment has influence positive with score sample original of 0.477 and the effect of second variable the considered significant because because statistic T value more big from t -table (5,616 > 1,991) or could said hypothesis accepted .Organizational Commitment to Turnover Intention has influence negative with score sample original of -0.172 and the effect of second variable the considered no significant because because statistic T value more big from t -table (1,349 < 1.991) or could said hypothesis rejected .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2023 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: