Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation imposes a significant health and economic burden to society, prompting evaluation of the net budget impact of adopting direct-acting oral anticoagulants instead of warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF from the payer's perspective.
What is the net budget impact of using DOACs instead of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Thailand?
What is the net budget impact of using DOACs instead of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Thailand?
Edoxaban and apixaban demonstrated the lowest net budget impact among DOACs for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF in Thailand, supporting their inclusion in the National List of Essential Medicine.
DOACs add modest net budget impact (~$12-14M over 5 years in Thailand); supports considering lowest-NBI agents for essential medicines list alongside cost-effectiveness data.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can lead to a significant health and economic burden to society. This study aimed to assess the net budget impact of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) instead of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF from the payer's perspective. METHODS: A budget model over a 5-year period was used. Dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, edoxaban 60 mg, and edoxaban 30 mg were included. Inputs were retrieved from published literature. Adoption rate of DOACs started at 5% and subsequently had a 5% increase in each year. Net budget impact (NBI) and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The average NBI over the 5-year horizon for all DOACs ranged from 12.3 M USD to 13.9 M USD. Dabigatran 150 mg had the highest NBI, while edoxaban 30 mg had the lowest NBI. The average NBI/patient/year ranged from 63.03 USD - 70.75 USD. CONCLUSIONS: Of all DOACs, edoxaban 30 mg, apixaban 5 mg, and edoxaban 60 mg are the top 3 lowest NBI. Together with cost-effectiveness evidence, those DOACs should be considered to be listed on the National List of Essential Medicine in Thailand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dilokthornsakul et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: