Why the study?
Observational studies consistently show low rates of guideline-recommended step-wise lipid-lowering therapy adaptions and low LDL-C target achievement post-ACS, leaving patients at residual risk.
Does upfront initiation of combined lipid-lowering therapy improve LDL-C target achievement and reduce cardiovascular events in post-ACS patients compared to step-wise escalation?
Does upfront initiation of combined lipid-lowering therapy improve LDL-C target achievement and reduce cardiovascular events in post-ACS patients compared to step-wise escalation?
A clinical consensus statement proposes an upfront combination lipid-lowering strategy ('strike early and strike strong') post-ACS to overcome the limitations of step-wise escalation and reduce early recurrent ischemic events.
Advocates intensified LDL-C lowering immediately post-ACS; extends 'lower is better' into updated acute-care guidelines.
After experiencing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients are at a high risk of suffering from recurrent ischaemic cardiovascular events, especially in the very early phase. Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is causally involved in atherosclerosis and a clear, monotonic relationship between pharmacologic LDL-C lowering and a reduction in cardiovascular events post-ACS has been shown, a concept termed 'the lower, the better'. Current ESC guidelines suggest an LDL-C guided, step-wise initiation and escalation of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Observational studies consistently show low rates of guideline-recommended LLT adaptions and concomitant low rates of LDL-C target goal achievement, leaving patients at residual risk, especially in the vulnerable post-ACS phase. In addition to the well-established 'the lower, the better' approach, a 'strike early and strike strong' approach in the early post-ACS phase with upfront initiation of a combined lipid-lowering approach using high-intensity statins and ezetimibe seems reasonable. We discuss the rationale, clinical trial evidence and experience for such an approach and highlight existing knowledge gaps. In addition, the concept of acute initiation of PCSK9 inhibition in the early phase is reviewed. Ultimately, we focus on hurdles and solutions to provide high-quality, evidence-based follow-up care in post-ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krychtiuk et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: