Why the study?
Manual bio-signal annotation is time-consuming, but automated annotating algorithms often suffer from low precision and low robustness.
Does a continuous-valued annotation aggregation model improve heart rate detection accuracy in noisy ECG recordings compared to single annotators or simple averaging?
Does a continuous-valued annotation aggregation model improve heart rate detection accuracy in noisy ECG recordings compared to single annotators or simple averaging?
A probabilistic model aggregating multiple automated QRS annotators and incorporating signal quality indices significantly improves heart rate estimation accuracy from noisy ECG recordings.
In the medical field, experts usually annotate the bio-signals manually, and this is regarded as the gold standard. The manual annotating mode is time-consuming so widely replaced by an automated annotating algorithm. To address the low precision and low robustness of algorithm, we used a probabilistic model to synthesize the heart rate (HR) annotations from multiple annotators for electrocardiograph (ECG) signals and inferred the underlying true annotations and the precision of each annotator when the ground truth was not available. We further introduced signal quality indices in the model to improve our estimation. The 100 noisy ECG recordings in 2014 PhysioNet/computing in cardiology challenge database were divided into two parts, and various annotations for HR were generated by six available annotators. By employing the expectation maximization algorithm, we obtained the estimated true annotations for 80 recordings, and this result had an improvement not only over the best single annotator (17.46%) used in this paper but also to the mean and median strategies (the highest of 23.12% and 42.23%). Furthermore, the estimated precision of the single annotator from the proposed model served as the weight of the test data. In independent test, the weighted average of multiple annotations was superior to the single annotator and the mean strategy on 20 recordings, and its root mean square error (14.22 bpm) was close to that (13.96 bpm) of the proposed model on 80 recordings, demonstrating the robustness of the proposed continuous-valued annotation aggregation model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: