Clinical Trial of Vitamin D₂ vs D₃ Supplementation in Critically Ill Pediatric Burn Patients

Background: Hypovitaminosis D exists postburn. However, evidence‐based guidelines for vitamin D repletion are unknown. This investigation examined differences between D 2 and D 3 supplementation on outcome in children with burn injuries. Methods : Fifty patients with total body surface area burn of 55.7% ± 2.6% and full‐thickness injury of 40.8% ± 3.8% were enrolled, ranging in age from 0.7–18.4 years. All participants received multivitamin supplementation per standardized clinical protocol. In addition, 100 IU/kg D 2 , D 3 , or placebo was administered daily during hospitalization using a randomized, double‐blinded study design. Assay of total 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (D25), 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D (D1,25), 25‐hydroxyvitamin D 2 (25‐OH‐D 2 ), 25‐hydroxyvitamin D 3 (25‐OH‐D 3 ), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) was performed at 4 preplanned time intervals (baseline, midpoint, discharge, and 1 year postburn). Differences in vitamin D status were compared over time and at each specific study interval. Results : There were no significant differences in serum vitamin D levels between groups, but >10% of patients had low D25 at discharge, and percent deficiency worsened by the 1‐year follow up for the placebo (75%), D 2 (56%), and D 3 (25%) groups. There were no statistical differences in PTH or clinical outcomes between treatment groups, although vitamin D supplementation demonstrated nonsignificant but clinically relevant decreases in exogenous insulin requirements, sepsis, and scar formation. Conclusions : The high incidence of low serum D25 levels 1 year following serious thermal injury indicates prolonged compromise. Continued treatment with vitamin D 3 beyond the acute phase postburn is recommended to counteract the trajectory of abnormal serum levels and associated morbidity.