Why the study?
Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent lower-extremity injury among soccer players, leading to the question of whether the FIFA 11+ program prevents these injuries in college-aged male soccer players.
Does the FIFA 11+ program prevent hamstring injuries in college-aged male soccer players?
Does the FIFA 11+ program prevent hamstring injuries in college-aged male soccer players?
There is moderate evidence supporting the incorporation of the FIFA 11+ program and Nordic hamstring exercise into warm-up routines to reduce hamstring injuries in male college soccer players.
Moderate evidence supports FIFA 11+ and Nordic exercises in male college soccer warm-ups; leaves open confirmation via larger RCTs.
Clinical Scenario: Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent lower-extremity injury among soccer players. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) has addressed this issue by developing the FIFA 11+ program, which is focused on improving strength and decreasing the incidence of lower-extremity injuries in the sport. This critically appraised topic focuses on this program as well as one of its components, the Nordic hamstring exercise, in the prevention of hamstring injuries. Clinical Question: Does the FIFA 11+ program prevent hamstring injuries in college-aged male soccer players? Summary of Key Findings: Four studies were selected to be critically appraised. The PEDro checklist was used to score the articles on methodology and consistency. All 4 articles demonstrated support for the clinical question. Clinical Bottom Line: There is moderate evidence to support the use of the FIFA 11+ program and Nordic hamstring exercise as part of a college soccer team's warm-up routine. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B evidence exists in support of incorporating the FIFA 11+ program to reduce the incidence of hamstring injuries in male college soccer players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Street et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: