Key result
Early AF ablation within 1 year linked to ~19% lower risk of clinically treated recurrence.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation outcomes and the optimal timing of ablation in patients with AF and HFpEF remain uncertain.
Does early catheter ablation reduce AF recurrence requiring clinical intervention in adults with AF and HFpEF compared to delayed ablation?
Cohort (n=5,550)
Yes
Does early catheter ablation reduce AF recurrence requiring clinical intervention in adults with AF and HFpEF compared to delayed ablation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.81 (95% CI 0.76–0.87)
Absolute Event Rate: 56.5% vs 61%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with AF and HFpEF, early catheter ablation (within 1 year of diagnosis) is associated with significantly reduced AF recurrence and all-cause hospitalizations compared to delayed ablation, though it does not significantly impact mortality.
Early ablation may lower AF recurrence in HFpEF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) progression in patients with AF and HF with reduced ejection fraction; however, outcomes in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially the optimal timing of ablation, remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with AF and HFpEF based on the temporal correlation between the AF diagnosis and the ablation procedure utilizing real-world data. METHODS: In this observational cohort study using the U.S. Collaborative Network in TriNetX, adults with AF and HFpEF between October 2018 and October 2024 were identified. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 5550 patients were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or repeat AF ablation after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization, mortality, HF exacerbation, and AAD use up to 4 years of follow-up. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing ablation within 1 year of AF diagnosis and those having ablation after 1 year. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 742 ± 489 days, early AF ablation was associated with lower risks of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.87, p < 0.001), reduced hospitalization (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.87, p < 0.001), and lower AAD Class I or III use (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in HF exacerbations (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.00, p = 0.950) or mortality (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91-1.53, p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: Early catheter ablation was associated with a decreased all-cause hospitalization and AF recurrence in HFpEF patients but did not reduce HF exacerbations or mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moersdorf et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=5,550). Early catheter ablation (≤ 1 year from AF diagnosis) vs. Delayed catheter ablation (> 1 year from AF diagnosis) was evaluated on Composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or repeat AF ablation after a 3-month blanking period (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.87, p=<0.001). Early catheter ablation within 1 year of atrial fibrillation diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence requiring clinical intervention compared to delayed ablation (HR 0.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: