Why the study?
Catheter ablation effectively treats AF but requires significant resources that may not be available everywhere, creating potential disparities in care.
Does the utilization of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation vary by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition at the ZIP code level?
Does the utilization of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation vary by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition at the ZIP code level?
Significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities exist in the utilization of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, which may propagate broader health disparities.
Disparities in AF ablation access by race, geography, and socioeconomic status warrant attention; leaves open causal drivers and equity interventions.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), however, it requires a significant amount of resources that may not be available in all areas. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand geographic, racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in the utilization of catheter ablation for AF. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AF were identified from the Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient data files between 2016 and 2019. To study inequities in utilization, we generated Generalized Estimating Equations to model the association between ZIP code-level racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition and ZIP code-level catheter ablation rates among patients with AF. RESULTS: For each 10% increase in the percentage of patients who were dual-eligible for Medicaid (a marker of poverty) in a ZIP code, 275 fewer patients per 10,000 underwent AF ablation (P = .0003). After adjusting for dual-eligible status, for each 10% increase in the percentage of Black patients in a ZIP code, 618 fewer underwent AF ablation (P < .0001), whereas for each 10% increase in the percentage of Hispanic patients, 430 fewer underwent AF ablation (P = .002). CONCLUSION: There are significant inequities in utilization of AF ablation, associated with racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences. Inequitable utilization in marginalized groups of patients may generate and propagate inequities in health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: