Why the study?
Does combined radiofrequency and direct current catheter ablation increase complications compared to direct current ablation alone in a porcine model?
Does combined radiofrequency and direct current catheter ablation increase complications compared to direct current ablation alone in a porcine model?
Combining radiofrequency and direct current energy for catheter ablation in the same session carries a high risk of myocardial perforation and death in a porcine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Raises perforation risk with combined ablation in porcine hearts; leaves open translation to clinical safety.
When radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is unsuccessful, an option may be to combine it with direct current energy. We therefore investigated the effects of such a combination. Radiofrequency energy was delivered in a bipolar or unipolar fashion to the left and right ventricles through an ablation catheter with a tip electrode 2 mm long, using a temperature-guided radiofrequency generator. Radiofrequency ablation was followed by a single cathodal direct current shock (66 J) with the ablation catheter positioned similarly in six closed-chest pigs. In a control group (six animals) only direct current ablation was performed, with one or two energy applications (66 J) in each ventricle. Two of six animals in the radiofrequency/direct current group died due to perforation in the follow-up period, 1 and 3.5 h after the direct current ablation, respectively. Gross pathological examination of the hearts revealed transmural lesions in all animals. In the radiofrequency/direct current group four lesions were perforated, three of which were located in the left ventricle. There was a significant increase in the number of perforations in the radiofrequency/direct current group compared to the control group, where perforation was never observed. Haemorrhagic pericardial fluid was found in five of the six animals in the radiofrequency/direct current group compared to none in the control group. These findings show that myocardial ablation with radiofrequency energy followed by direct current energy in the same session may have a high complication rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kongsgaard et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: