Why the study?
Intradialytic blood pressure is the primary hemodynamic monitoring parameter during hemodialysis, but assessing cardiac output and total peripheral resistance throughout treatment could provide valuable information.
Does non-invasive whole-body bio-impedance monitoring identify distinct hemodynamic profiles and predict 1-year mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients?
Does non-invasive whole-body bio-impedance monitoring identify distinct hemodynamic profiles and predict 1-year mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients?
Non-invasive hemodynamic profiling during hemodialysis reveals that very few patients remain hemodynamically stable, and specific profiles (low cardiac power index and low total peripheral resistance index) are associated with higher 1-year mortality.
Bioimpedance profiling may refine intradialytic risk stratification beyond BP alone; leaves open whether targeting profiles improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) measurement is currently the main parameter used for monitoring hemodynamics during hemodialysis (HD). Since BP is dependent on cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, knowledge of these parameters throughout the HD treatment would potentially be valuable. METHODS: The use of a novel non-invasive monitoring system for profiling hemodynamic response patterns during HD was explored: a whole-body bio-impedance system was used to assess cardiac index (CI), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), cardiac power index (CPI) among other parameters in chronic HD patients from 4 medical centers. Measurements were made pre, during and post dialysis. Patients were grouped into 5 hemodynamic profiles based on their main hemodynamic response during dialysis i.e. high TPRI; high CPI; low CPI; low TPRI and those with normal hemodynamics. Comparisons were made between the groups for baseline characteristics and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: In 144 patients with mean age of 67.3 ± 12.1 years pre-dialysis hemodynamic measurements were within normal limits in 35.4% but only 6.9% overall remained hemodynamically stable during dialysis. Intradialytic BP decreased in 65 (45.1%) in whom, low CPI (47 (72.3%)) and low TPRI (18 (27.7%) were recorded. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates were highest in patients with low CPI (23.4%) and low TPRI (22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive assessment of patients' response to HD provides relevant hemodynamic information that exceeds that provided by currently used BP measurements. Use of these online analyses could potentially improve the safety and performance standards of dialysis by guiding appropriate interventions, particularly in responding to hypertension and hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doenyas‐Barak et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: