Why the study?
The study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between recombinant tissue plasminogen activator plus tirofiban and rt-PA alone in patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke treated within 24 hours.
Does adjunctive tirofiban combined with standard intravenous thrombolysis improve 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke treated within 24 hours?
Does adjunctive tirofiban combined with standard intravenous thrombolysis improve 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke treated within 24 hours?
In patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke treated within 24 hours, adjunctive tirofiban following standard intravenous thrombolysis significantly improved 90-day functional outcomes without increasing the risk of major bleeding.
Adjunctive tirofiban may improve 90-day function in APCIS without excess bleeding; leaves open efficacy pending randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between recombinant tissue plasminogen activator plus tirofiban (rt-PA + T) and rt-PA alone in patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke (APCIS) treated within 24 h. METHODS: In this retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke. The intervention group (rt-PA + T) received standard-dose rt-PA followed by intravenous tirofiban, whereas the control group (rt-PA) received rt-PA alone. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) at 90 days. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 256 patients (128 per group) were included in the final analysis. The proportion of patients achieving a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days was significantly higher in the rt-PA + T group than in the rt-PA group (63.3% vs. 50.0%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.05-2.84, P = 0.033). Functional independence (mRS 0-2) was also more common in the rt-PA + T group (73.4% vs. 60.9%; OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.01, P = 0.034). No significant differences were observed in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (1.6% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.498), any bleeding (6.3% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.454), or 90-day mortality (2.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.654). Subgroup analysis indicated greater benefit in patients with baseline NIHSS < 10 (P for interaction = 0.029). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute non-cardioembolic posterior circulation ischemic stroke treated within 24 h of onset, adjunctive tirofiban following standard intravenous thrombolysis was associated with significantly improved 90-day functional outcomes without a notable increase in major bleeding risk, particularly in patients with lower baseline NIHSS scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: