Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty on right ventricular mechanical dysfunction in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension using MRI.
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve right ventricular mechanical dysfunction in patients with inoperable CTEPH?
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve right ventricular mechanical dysfunction in patients with inoperable CTEPH?
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty significantly improves right ventricular mechanical dysfunction, pulmonary hemodynamics, and myocardial remodeling in patients with inoperable CTEPH.
BPA was associated with improved RV strain in inoperable CTEPH; leaves open prospective validation of strain-guided monitoring.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) on right ventricular (RV) mechanical dysfunction in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) via MRI. METHOD: MRI at 1.5 Tesla and right heart catheterization were performed before and 6 months after BPA in 30 CTEPH patients (mean age 63.4 ± 10.6 years; 17 female). Feature-tracking strain analysis, including global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), and radial (GRS) strain, was performed and compared with right ventricular function, myocardial remodelling (assessed by native T1 times), and pulmonary haemodynamics (mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance). RESULTS: ) decreased after BPA (all p < 0.0001). Moreover, RV strain increased (GLS -19.9 to -24.0%, p = 0.0003; GCS -9.4 to -11.0%, p = 0.0022; GRS 38.2 to 50.7%, p = 0.001) and septal native area-adjusted T1 time (AA-T1) decreased (1019.4 to 988.7 ms, p < 0.0001). GLS revealed the best correlations with RVEF (before BPA r = -0.75; after BPA r = -0.54), mPAP (r = 0.36; r = 0.52), PVR (r = 0.49; r = 0.48), and AA-T1 (r = 0.44; 0.19). CONCLUSION: RV mechanical dysfunction, pulmonary haemodynamics, and myocardial remodelling are markedly improved by BPA. Moreover, RV strain values showed good correlations with RV function, pulmonary haemodynamics, and myocardial remodelling. Therefore, strain analysis might provide new insights regarding therapy outcome, monitoring, and prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roller et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: