Why the study?
What is the prevalence of congenital coronary artery anomalies detected by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography?
What is the prevalence of congenital coronary artery anomalies detected by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography?
MSCT coronary angiography identified a 9.37% prevalence of congenital coronary artery anomalies in a Turkish cohort, demonstrating its value as a noninvasive diagnostic tool.
Adds cross-sectional prevalence data from MSCT; leaves open generalizability and need for outcome studies before screening changes.
Objective Coronary artery anomaly (CAA) is a remarkable etiological factor for sudden cardiac death in young adults. The incidence of CAA is unknown, with most reliable data available based on postmortem/angiography investigations. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different forms of coronary anomalies, and to investigate the relationships between demographic data and occurrence of CAA. Methods A total of 2401 consecutive patients (1805 men; mean age, 56 ± 11.7 years), who were referred between January 2005 and December 2008 for noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging, were retrospectively analysed. Results A total of 225 cases (191 men; mean age, 55.9 ± 12) of CAAs were identified (9.37%). Because 11 patients had multiple muscular bridges of the coronary arteries, 236 coronary artery anomalies were found in these 225 patients. Cases were classified into three groups: group 1, coronary anomalies of origin and distribution (n = 36, 1.5%); group 2, anomalies of intrinsic coronary arterial anatomy (n = 180, 7.49%); and group 3, anomalies of coronary termination (n = 9, 0.4%). Conclusion The prevalence of CAA was 9.37% in our single-centre study, which is consistent with previous research. A minimally invasive tool, such as MSCT angiography, should be used to identify CAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tongut et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: