Why the study?
Does a critical care nurse-led rapid response team reduce cardiopulmonary arrests occurring outside the intensive care unit in hospitalized patients?
Does a critical care nurse-led rapid response team reduce cardiopulmonary arrests occurring outside the intensive care unit in hospitalized patients?
A cost-neutral, critical care nurse-led rapid response team can be sustainably implemented to reduce cardiopulmonary arrests outside the ICU.
May support cost-neutral nurse-led rapid response teams; leaves open randomized confirmation of out-of-ICU arrest reduction.
Rapid response teams have been introduced to intervene in the care of patients whose condition deteriorates unexpectedly by bringing clinical experts quickly to the patient's bedside. Evidence supporting the need to overcome failure to deliver optimal care in hospitals is robust; whether rapid response teams demonstrate benefit by improving patient safety and reducing the occurrence of adverse events remains controversial. Despite inconsistent evidence regarding the effectiveness of rapid response teams, concerns regarding care and costly consequences of unaddressed deterioration in patients' condition have prompted many hospitals to implement rapid response teams as a patient safety strategy. A cost-neutral structure for a rapid response team led by a nurse from the intensive care unit was implemented with the goal of reducing cardiopulmonary arrests occurring outside the intensive care unit. The results of 6 years' experience indicate that a sustainable and effective rapid response team response can be put into practice without increasing costs or adding positions and can decrease the percentage of cardiopulmonary arrests occurring outside the intensive care unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: