Why the study?
Sacubitril/valsartan showed promising early results in heart failure, but its effects on overall functional capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life remained unknown.
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve functional capacity, exercise capacity, or quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve functional capacity, exercise capacity, or quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
Sacubitril-valsartan does not appear to significantly improve functional capacity, exercise capacity, or quality of life in patients with HFpEF based on current RCT evidence.
Sacubitril/valsartan yields minimal gains in functional capacity or quality of life in HFpEF; challenges extrapolation from HFrEF mortality trials to these endpoints.
Background: Sacubitril/Valsartan use in heart failure has shown promising results in early trials. However, the effects on the overall functional capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life are unknown. Aims: We aimed to understand the results of studies that attempted to measure these outcomes that affect the mobility and day-to-day life of these patients. Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ISRCTN were explored to look for clinical trials relevant to the literature. Results: A total of three high-quality randomized controlled trials were discovered that evaluated the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on functional capacity, exercise capacity, or quality of life. All of them were industry-funded and revealed no statistical difference in the mentioned outcomes. No study measured peak oxygen uptake or ventilation/carbon dioxide ratio slope. Conclusion: Sacubitril-valsartan had minimal to no impact on functional capacity, exercise capacity, or quality of life. However, future prospective studies with more sensitive outcome measures should be conducted to validate the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasavada et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: