Why the study?
Does routine preoperative chest CT improve the detection of clinically relevant metastases in patients with colorectal cancer?
Does routine preoperative chest CT improve the detection of clinically relevant metastases in patients with colorectal cancer?
Routine preoperative chest CT in colorectal cancer patients detects more indeterminate pulmonary lesions without increasing the detection of true metastases, adding little clinical value.
Routine chest CT adds little value for true metastasis detection in colorectal cancer; leaves open selective use in high-risk subgroups.
AIM: Patients with lung metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) may benefit from surgical resection. Chest computed tomography (CT) is often included in the preoperative staging. Interpretation of the nature of pulmonary lesions is not always easy and many question its clinical value. METHOD: Clinical data for all patients treated at our institution for CRC have been collected prospectively in a dedicated database. Since August 2008 chest CT has been routinely performed for preoperative staging. The outcome of 147 patients operated on since then (Group A) was compared with a numerically equal group of patients (147) (Group B) treated before the introduction of preoperative routine chest CT. RESULTS: Pulmonary lesions were identified in 45 (30%) patients in Group A and 10 (6.8%) in Group B. Ten and nine lesions, respectively, were interpreted as metastases. In 28 (19%) patients in Group A, the lesions were considered to be indeterminate and only four were confirmed as malignant. Overall metastases were present after 1 year of follow-up in 5 (50%) of 10 patients in Group A and 5 (55%) of 9 in Group B. The global incidence of synchronous and metachronous metastases was 6.8%, with no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that chest CT reveals a higher number of pulmonary lesions, only a small proportion of which were malignant. The investigation does not add value to routine staging methods in patients with CRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Restivo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: