Why the study?
Do early-pregnancy changes in cardiac diastolic function differ between formerly pre-eclamptic women who do and do not develop recurrent pre-eclampsia?
Do early-pregnancy changes in cardiac diastolic function differ between formerly pre-eclamptic women who do and do not develop recurrent pre-eclampsia?
Formerly pre-eclamptic women who develop recurrent pre-eclampsia exhibit impaired first-trimester adaptation of cardiac diastolic function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Impaired early diastolic adaptation may flag recurrent pre-eclampsia risk; leaves open whether cardiac monitoring improves outcomes in high-risk pregnancies.
OBJECTIVE: To compare early-pregnancy changes in cardiac diastolic function between formerly pre-eclamptic women with (RECUR) and without (NORECUR) recurrent pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. POPULATION: Pregnant women with a history of early-onset pre-eclampsia (n = 34). METHODS: The peak mitral filling velocity in early diastole (E) and at atrial contraction (A), and the E/A ratio were assessed before and at 12, 16 and 20 weeks of gestation in the next pregnancy. Differences in early-pregnancy alterations between women with (RECUR) and without (NORECUR) recurrent pre-eclampsia were evaluated by use of mixed design analysis of covariance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac function and recurrent pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: In ten women (29%) pre-eclampsia recurred. By 12 weeks of gestation the E/A ratio had increased in the RECUR group, but not in the NORECUR group (P < 0.01). Moreover, from 16 weeks of gestation onwards, the RECUR group had a lower cardiac output and higher systemic vascular resistance as compared with the NORECUR group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that formerly pre-eclamptic women destined to develop recurrent pre-eclampsia differ from their counterparts who do not develop recurrent pre-eclampsia by impaired first-trimester adaptation of cardiac diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sep et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: