Why the study?
Since the publication of the 2023 ESC ACS guidelines, multiple studies and an ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia update have refined ACS diagnosis, revascularization, and treatment.
This review synthesizes recent advances in ACS management, emphasizing risk-stratified pathways for revascularization, antithrombotic therapy, and secondary prevention.
Refines ACS care from diagnosis to follow-up; extends 2023 ESC guidelines with 2023-2025 evidence for practice and trials.
Background: Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) remain a leading cause of death and disability. Since the publication of the 2023 ESC ACS guidelines, multiple studies and an ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia update have refined how clinicians diagnose, revascularize, and treat ACS across the care continuum. Content: This state-of-the-art review synthesizes advances from 2023 to 2025 across five domains. Diagnosis: High-sensitivity troponin-based accelerated pathways remain foundational; GRACE 3.0 improves calibration for early vs. delayed angiography, while selective use of CCTA and routine use of intracoronary imaging/physiology help define the mechanism and optimize PCI. Revascularization: complete revascularization continues to underpin care in multivessel disease, with recent data favouring culprit-only PCI acutely and staged non-culprit treatment during the index stay in most STEMI presentations, particularly with heart-failure physiology. Antithrombotic therapy: Aspirin remains critical early after ACS-PCI; emerging evidence supports shorter DAPT and aspirin withdrawal after 1 month in carefully selected, low-ischaemic-risk patients, whereas day-0 aspirin-free strategies in unselected ACS are not non-inferior. Secondary prevention: A “strike early and strong” approach to LDL-cholesterol—often with combination therapy in hospital—is emphasized, alongside nuanced roles for SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Special populations and implementation: Sex- and age-aware tailoring (including MINOCA/SCAD evaluation), pragmatic bleeding-risk mitigation, digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation, and registry-driven quality improvement translate evidence into practice. Summary: Contemporary ACS care is moving from uniform protocols toward risk-stratified, mechanism-informed pathways. We offer practical algorithms and checklists to align interventional timing, antithrombotic intensity/duration, and secondary prevention with individual patient risk—bridging new evidence to bedside decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: