Why the study?
Because DPP6 impacts both cardiomyocyte and neuronal function, it was hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation in risk haplotype carriers arises from functional changes in both the heart and autonomic nervous system.
Does the DPP6 risk haplotype alter heart rate variability and myocardial sympathetic innervation in carriers compared to noncarriers?
Does the DPP6 risk haplotype alter heart rate variability and myocardial sympathetic innervation in carriers compared to noncarriers?
Carriers of the DPP6 risk haplotype exhibit altered autonomic tone and myocardial sympathetic innervation, suggesting both cardiac and autonomic nervous system abnormalities contribute to sudden cardiac arrest risk.
Findings suggest labile autonomic tone in DPP6 carriers; leaves open whether primary ANS abnormalities contribute to VF.
Background A recently discovered sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) syndrome is linked to a risk haplotype that harbors the dipeptidyl-peptidase 6 (DPP6) gene as a plausible culprit. Objective Because DPP6 impacts both cardiomyocyte and neuronal function, we hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation (VF) in risk haplotype carriers arises from functional changes in both the heart and autonomic nervous system. Methods We studied 6 risk haplotype carriers with previous VF (symptomatic), 8 carriers without VF (asymptomatic), and 7 noncarriers (controls). We analyzed supine and standing heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity, pre-VF heart rate changes, and myocardial 123 I- meta -iodobenzylguanide ( 123 I- m IBG) scintigraphy. Results Carriers had longer interbeat intervals than controls (1.03 ± 0.11 seconds vs 0.81 ± 0.07 seconds; P <.001), lower low-frequency (LF) and higher high-frequency (HF) activity, and lower LF/HF ratio (0.68 ± 0.50 vs 2.11 ± 1.10; P = .013) in the supine position. Upon standing up, carriers had significantly larger decrease in interbeat interval and increase in LF than controls (standing-to-supine ratio: 0.78 ± 0.07 vs 0.90 ± 0.07; P = .002; and 1.94 ± 1.03 vs 1.17 ± 0.34; P = .022, respectively), and nonsignificantly larger decrease in HF (0.62 ± 0.36 vs 0.97 ± 0.42; P = .065) and increase in LF/HF ratio (5.55 ± 6.79 vs 1.62 ± 1.24; P = .054). Sixteen of 17 VF episodes occurred at rest. Heart rate immediately before VF was 110 ± 25 bpm. Symptomatic carriers had less heterogeneous 123 I- m IBG distribution in the left ventricle than asymptomatic carriers (single-photon emission computed tomography score ≥3 in 7 asymptomatic and 1 symptomatic carrier; P = .008). Conclusion It can be speculated that these data are consistent with more labile autonomic tone in carriers, suggesting that the primary abnormalities may reside in both the heart and the autonomic nervous system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verberne et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: