Why the study?
Does prosthesis-patient mismatch worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Does prosthesis-patient mismatch worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prosthesis-patient mismatch is a common and preventable complication of aortic valve replacement that negatively impacts hemodynamics, cardiac events, and survival.
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size. Its main haemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. This review updates the present knowledge about the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes. PPM is common (20-70% of aortic valve replacements) and has been shown to be associated with worse haemodynamic function, less regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, more cardiac events, and lower survival. Moreover, as opposed to most other risk factors, PPM can largely be prevented by using a prospective strategy at the time of operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Pibarot (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: