Why the study?
Infranodal conduction disorders are common after TAVR, but the risk factors remain incompletely understood.
Do valve implantation depth and calcium burden predict infranodal conduction delay after TAVR?
Do valve implantation depth and calcium burden predict infranodal conduction delay after TAVR?
Calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract underlying the non-coronary cusp, but not implantation depth, predicts intraprocedural infranodal conduction delay after TAVR.
Background Infranodal conduction disorders are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Risk factors are incompletely understood. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of valve implantation depth and calcium burden of the device landing zone on infranodal conduction intraprocedure pre- and post-TAVR. Methods In all patients undergoing TAVR between June 2020 and June 2021, the His-ventricle (HV) interval was measured pre- and post-valve deployment. The difference between the 2 measurements defined delta HV, whereas infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval >55 ms. Valve implantation depth was measured as the distance between the aortic annular plane and the ventricular prosthesis end. Calcium burden was quantified as the volume of calcium in 6 regions of interest: the non-, right, and left coronary cusps (NCC, RCC, and LCC, respectively) and the corresponding regions of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) underlying each cusp (LVOT NCC , LVOT RCC , LVOT LCC , respectively). Results Of 101 patients (mean age 81 ± 5.7 years; 47% women), 37 demonstrated infranodal conduction delay intraprocedure post-TAVR. Overall, mean implantation depth was 5 ± 3.1 mm, median calcium volume was 2080 mm 3 [interquartile range 632–2400]. Delta HV showed no correlation with implantation depth or calcium burden (r = –0.08 and r=0.12, respectively). However, LVOT NCC calcification was a significant predictor for infranodal conduction delay post-valve deployment in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.62 per 100-mm 3 increase (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.69; P = .04). Conclusion Assessment of LVOT NCC calcification may identify patients at risk for infranodal conduction delay after TAVR, whereas implantation depth did not predict infranodal conduction delay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: