Why the study?
Does an adjusted dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) improve safety and efficacy compared to warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment?
Does an adjusted dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) improve safety and efficacy compared to warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment?
A reduced dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) demonstrates consistent safety and efficacy compared to warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment.
Supports adjusted rivaroxaban as alternative to warfarin in this population; extends RCT evidence to Japanese NVAF patients with moderate renal impairment.
BACKGROUND: In the Japanese Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) study, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily was given to patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 50 ml/min (preserved renal function), and was reduced to 10mg once daily in patients with CrCl 30-49 ml/min (moderate renal impairment). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of the adjusted dose of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in a cohort with moderate renal impairment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Compared with patients with preserved renal function, those with moderate renal impairment (22.2% of all randomized patients) had higher rates of bleeding and stroke events irrespective of study treatment. Among those with moderate renal impairment, the principal safety endpoint occurred at 27.76%/year with rivaroxaban vs. 22.85%/year with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.91) and the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 2.77%/year vs. 3.34%/year (HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25-2.69), respectively. There were no significant interactions between renal function and study treatment in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints (P=0.628, 0.279 for both interactions, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were consistent in patients with moderate renal impairment and preserved renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hori et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: