Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bird–aircraft strikes are rare but high-impact events that pose persistent safety and operational challenges in aviation. Existing approaches often focus on predictive accuracy, with limited integration of probability calibration, rare-event precision, and decision-making under operational constraints. This paper proposes a calibrated threshold-optimized decision-support framework that anticipates short-term bird strike risk and translates probabilistic forecasts into constrained intervention plans. The framework combines (i) a calibrated occurrence model for short-term strike probability, (ii) a conditional intensity model for expected strike magnitude, and (iii) a constrained planning module that selects a limited number of high-risk time windows per day. The approach is evaluated using EASA bird strike data (2019–2024), enriched with environmental, meteorological, astronomical, tide, and traffic-proxy features. After this stricter temporal reconstruction, the calibrated occurrence model reaches ROC-AUC ≈0.636 and PR-AUC ≈0.050 across forward chain folds, while the OOF aggregate gives ROC-AUC =0.648 and PR-AUC =0.047 against a forward label prevalence of 0.0246. Under a strict daily alarm budget (K=2), OOF operational Precision@K is 0.063 and Recall@K is 0.075, with a median credited lead time of 90 min. The results highlight the importance of calibrated probabilities and decision-oriented evaluation, showing that effective rare-event management requires not only prediction, but also integration with operational planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: