Advanced patient monitoring displays in anesthesia show potential for improving situational awareness and response times, but further research is needed to understand their impact in complex, real-world operative environments.
Does not support changing anesthesia monitoring displays; leaves open real-world outcome benefits.
In Brief We reviewed the use of advanced display technologies for monitoring in anesthesia. Researchers are investigating displays that integrate information and that, in some cases, also deliver the results continuously to the anesthesiologist. Integrated visual displays reveal higher-order properties of patient state and speed in responding to events, but their benefits under an intensely timeshared load is unknown. Head-mounted displays seem to shorten the time to respond to changes, but their impact on peripheral awareness and attention is unknown. Continuous auditory displays extending pulse oximetry seem to shorten response times and improve the ability to timeshare other tasks, but their integration into the already noisy operative environment still needs to be tested. We reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of the three approaches, drawing on findings from other fields, such as aviation, to suggest outcomes where there are still no results for the anesthesia context. Proving that advanced patient monitoring displays improve patient outcomes is difficult, and a more realistic goal is probably to prove that such displays lead to better situational awareness, earlier responding, and less workload, all of which keep anesthesia practice away from the outer boundaries of safe operation. IMPLICATIONS: This paper presents a critical review of advanced display technologies to support anesthesia monitoring. We review laboratory, simulator, and clinical studies of configural graphic displays, head-mounted displays, and continuous auditory displays, noting the advantages and disadvantages of each technology for the anesthesiologist and pointing to further research needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanderson et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: