Why the study?
Prevalence of AFib is elevated in adults with unrepaired ASD, prompting a comparison of clinical outcomes across different treatment strategies.
Do different surgical or interventional treatment strategies improve clinical outcomes in adult patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation?
Do different surgical or interventional treatment strategies improve clinical outcomes in adult patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation?
In adults with ASD and AFib, ASD closure alone is effective for paroxysmal AFib, while bi-atrial surgical ablation is superior to right-atrial ablation for preventing AFib recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bi-atrial surgical ablation may lower AF recurrence versus right-atrial alone in unrepaired adult ASD; extends limited comparative evidence for combined strategies.
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AFib) in adult patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) who did not undergo ASD repair in the childhood is higher than that in general population. The primary aim of this study is to collect various related articles published in the literature and to compare the clinical outcomes with different treatment strategies by systemic reviews and meta-analyses. Of the 1299 initially screened articles, 13 studies with 213 patients were included in this study. All the patients were adults and the mean age at presentation was 55.7 years (range 34-79 years) and 47.8% of the patients were male. Regarding the types of the AFib, there were paroxysmal AFib in 62 patients, persistent AFib in 40 patients and long-standing persistent AFib in 111 patients. For adult patients with ASD and AFib, ASD closure is beneficial for most of the patients if significant left-to-right shunt exists but risk stratification cannot be overlooked because worsening of the functional class may be experienced by some patients post-operatively, especially for the patients with advanced age (>75 years). Reduction of prevalence of AFib could be observed after ASD closure alone which is mainly effective for paroxysmal AFib but not for persistent or long-standing persistent AFib. The successful ablation rate of paroxysmal AFib by catheter ablation is similar to that of all kinds of AFib by surgical ablation. Regarding AFib recurrence, bi-atrial surgical ablation is better than right-atrial ablation for the adult patients with ASD and AFib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: