Key result
Unrepaired ASD linked to ~27% higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation.
Why the study?
Evidence to guide post-ablation risk stratification in adults with atrial septal defect undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation remains limited.
Does atrial septal defect management status affect the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing their first atrial fibrillation ablation compared with an intact septum?
Cohort (n=27,675)
Does atrial septal defect management status affect the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing their first atrial fibrillation ablation compared with an intact septum?
Unrepaired ASD and surgical repair are associated with a higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after first AF ablation compared to an intact septum, whereas percutaneous closure is not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May prompt closer post-ablation surveillance in unrepaired or surgically repaired ASD; leaves open whether closure strategy modifies recurrence risk.
BACKGROUND: As more adults with atrial septal defect (ASD) survive into older age and undergo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, evidence to guide post-ablation risk stratification remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term outcomes after the first AF ablation across ASD management states compared with an intact interatrial septum. METHODS: This real-world cohort study included 27 675 patients undergoing their first AF ablation, classified by interatrial septal status as intact septum (n = 27 134), unrepaired ASD (n = 232), percutaneous closure (n = 119), or surgical repair (n = 190). Three pairwise comparisons with an intact septum were constructed. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess outcomes. The primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the 3-month blanking period; the secondary outcome was a composite cardiovascular outcome. RESULTS: Compared with an intact septum, unrepaired ASD was associated with a higher recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51; p = 0.006), with excess risk mainly observed between 3 months and 1 year after ablation. Surgical repair was also associated with higher recurrence risk (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46; p = 0.038), with differences emerging beyond 1 year. Percutaneous closure was not associated with increased recurrence risk (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.83-1.38; p = 0.589). Composite cardiovascular outcomes did not differ significantly across groups. CONCLUSIONS: ASD management status identified distinct temporal patterns of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation, suggesting that ASD should not be treated as a single binary condition in post-ablation risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and atrial septal defect (n=27,675). Unrepaired ASD, percutaneous closure, or surgical repair vs. Intact interatrial septum was evaluated on Atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the 3-month blanking period (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51, p=0.006). Compared to an intact septum, unrepaired ASD (HR 1.27; P=0.006) and surgical repair (HR 1.21; P=0.038) were associated with a higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after first AF ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: