Why the study?
To increase awareness of Cutibacterium acnes as a cause of bacterial pericarditis and pleural infection, which presents a diagnostic challenge due to atypical presentation and difficult isolation.
Cutibacterium acnes should be considered a potential pathogen rather than a contaminant in cases of bacterial pericarditis, especially in susceptible patients.
Maintain suspicion for infectious pericarditis despite missing classic signs; case reports leave open validated diagnostic algorithms.
Infectious pericarditis does not always present with all the classic findings. Some of the traditional signs of fever, pleuritic chest pain, and frictional rub may be missing. This presents a diagnostic challenge, thus clinical suspicion is important. The most common cause of infectious pericarditis is viral. However, bacterial pericarditis may occur with severe complications such as constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, left ventricular pseudoaneurysm, and aortic mycotic aneurysm. The purpose of this presentation is to increase awareness of Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) as a cause of bacterial pericarditis. This case report highlights C. acnes as a prevalent cause of both pleural and pericardial infections. The diagnosis can be challenging, considering that this bacterium is difficult to isolate, slow growing, and causes indolent illness. Prolonged incubation time may be required. In addition to the more traditional causes of bacterial pericarditis, namely Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, C acnes appears to play an important role. It should not be considered a contaminant as it may require further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: