Why the study?
Limited evidence exists regarding the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and frailty.
Does canagliflozin reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes irrespective of frailty status?
Does canagliflozin reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes irrespective of frailty status?
Canagliflozin improves cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes regardless of baseline frailty status, supporting the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in frail populations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Canagliflozin may benefit frail T2D patients; leaves open prospective trials confirming safety and dosing in severe frailty.
BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Limited evidence exists about the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with frailty. METHODS: This was a post hoc pooled, participant-level data analysis of the CANVAS Program (CANVAS and CANVAS-R) and the CREDENCE trial. We examined the effect of canagliflozin on: (1) Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), (2) Cardiovascular mortality, (3) all-cause mortality, and (4) key safety outcomes. Frailty was defined by a Frailty Index (FI) based on a deficit accumulation approach (FI > 0.25: frail). Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin overall and according to frailty status. RESULTS: There were 14,543 participants (10,142 from the CANVAS Program, 4401 from the CREDENCE trial). Their mean age was 63.2 years; 35.3% were female. Frailty was present in 56% of the study participants. The benefits of canagliflozin were observed in both the frail and non-frail subgroups: HRs for MACE 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90) in the frail versus 0.91 (95% CI 0.75-1.09) in the non-frail (p for interaction = 0.27); HRs for cardiovascular mortality 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.95) in the frail versus 0.94 (95% CI 0.70-1.27) in the non-frail (p for interaction = 0.38); HRs for all-cause mortality 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.94) in the frail versus 0.93 (95% CI 0.74-1.16) in the non-frail (p for interaction = 0.39). Adverse events were similar among frail and non-frail participants, except for osmotic diuresis (HRs 1.67, 95% CI 1.22-2.28 in the frail vs. 3.05, 95% CI 2.13-4.35 in the non-frail, p for interaction = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin improved cardiovascular and mortality endpoints in participants with type 2 diabetes irrespective of frailty status, with a similar safety profile. Our findings, in addition to those from other recent studies, provide evidence to support the introduction of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients perceived to be frail. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov CANVAS: NCT01032629; CANVAS-R: NCT01989754; CREDENCE: NCT02065791.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: