Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 2, 2024World Journal of Clinical CasesOpen Access

Effect of cardiac rehabilitation care after coronary intervention on cardiac function recovery and negative mood in patients with myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

To evaluate the effects of cardiac rehabilitation care on cardiac function recovery and negative emotions in patients with myocardial infarction after coronary intervention.

Does cardiac rehabilitation care improve cardiac function recovery and negative emotions in patients with myocardial infarction after coronary intervention?

Population

180 patients with MI after coronary intervention

Comparison

Cardiac rehabilitation care vs conventional care

Authors

MYMing YangJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese MedicineYHYuan-Tao HuangFujian Medical UniversityXHXiwen HuHangzhou Seventh Peoples Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May support rehab integration post-MI intervention; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.

Structured PICO

Does cardiac rehabilitation care improve cardiac function recovery and negative emotions in patients with myocardial infarction after coronary intervention?

P
Population
180 patients with myocardial infarction after coronary intervention. Observation group (n=90): mean age 36.26 ± 9.88 years, 44 males. Control group (n=90): mean age 40.87 ± 10.5 years, 43 males.
I
Intervention
Cardiac rehabilitation care
C
Comparator
Conventional care
O
Outcome
Cardiac function indicators (left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction), blood pressure, exercise tolerance (6-minute walking test), occurrence of adverse cardiac events, and negative emotion scores

Cardiac rehabilitation care after coronary intervention for myocardial infarction significantly improves cardiac function, exercise tolerance, and psychological well-being while reducing adverse cardiac events.

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d16a2b0b0e582d537ced9https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.59
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review2020 · 189 citations
  2. 2Signaling pathways and targeted therapy for myocardial infarction2022 · 861 citations
  3. 3Technical consideration in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A review of antithrombotic and PCI therapies2019 · 29 citations
  4. 4Educational Preparation, Roles, and Competencies to Guide Career Development for Cardiac Rehabilitation Nurses2016 · 17 citations
  5. 5China cardiovascular diseases report 2018: an updated summary.2020 · 406 citations