Why the study?
Valvular heart disease disproportionately affects older adults, but direct comparisons of clinical characteristics, sonographic diagnosis, and outcomes in patients aged over 65 years are scarce.
Advanced age significantly affects the prognosis of geriatric patients with valvular heart disease, with distinct clinical predictors for major adverse cardiac events in those aged 75 and older.
May inform risk stratification in elderly valvular patients; leaves open prospective validation of modifiable predictors.
BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease (VHD) is expected to become more prevail as the population ages and disproportionately affects older adults. However, direct comparison of clinical characteristics, sonographic diagnosis, and outcomes in VHD patients aged over 65 years is scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in two age-groups of geriatric patients with VHD. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive individuals aged ≥ 65 years from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and screened for VHD using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Finally, 260 (48.9%) patients were in the 65-74 years group, and 272 (51.1%) were in the ≥ 75-year group. Factors that affected long-term survival was explored. A multivariable Cox hazards regression was performed to identify the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in each group. RESULTS: = 0.011) at long-term follow-up. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, mitral regurgitation, a history of COPD, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were identified as independent predictors of MACEs in the older group. CONCLUSION: Advanced age profoundly affect prognosis and different predictors were associated with MACEs in geriatric patients with VHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: