Background: Sleep disturbances impact quality of life among gynecologic cancer survivors (GCS), yet comprehensive understanding of sleep determinants remains limited.Methods: We analyzed National Health Interview Survey (2009–2018) data among GCS (N = 1,680). Sleep duration was categorized as short (< 7 h), optimal (7–9 h), or long (< 9 h). Multinomial logistic regression models examined associations with lifestyle factors, health outcomes, and social determinants of health adjusting for age, BMI, and year with optimal sleep being the reference.Results: Among GCS, 37.9% reported short sleep, 57.1% optimal sleep, and 5.0% long sleep. In the fully adjusted model, women reporting fair/poor health compared to excellent/very good/good health had higher odds of short sleep (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.38–2.71) and long sleep (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI: 2.10–8.09). Women with graduate degrees, compared to those with less than high school education (aOR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.23–2.83) and high school graduation (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.10–2.10) had higher odds of short sleep. Uninsured women compared to insured women had lower odds of short sleep (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34–0.84) and long sleep (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19–0.78).Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of addressing social determinants and health equity in sleep interventions for cancer survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: