Why the study?
What are the percutaneous treatment options and their current evidence base for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
What are the percutaneous treatment options and their current evidence base for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Percutaneous treatments such as balloon pulmonary angioplasty offer promising alternatives for CTEPH patients ineligible for surgery, though rigorous clinical trials are still needed to establish their definitive role.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BPA may be considered at experienced centers for inoperable CTEPH; leaves open its role versus alternatives pending powered RCTs.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) occurs as a consequence of a series of events that includes arterial obstruction by embolic material, secondary in situ thrombosis, cytokine activation and inflammation, and small vessel angiopathy. Medical therapies have a limited efficacy. Only the guanylate cyclase stimulator, riociguat, is approved for this condition. Surgical pulmonary endarterectomy is the definitive treatment for patients with proximal disease, but one third of patients with CTEPH are considered ineligible for surgery. Another third have significant residual pulmonary hypertension postoperatively. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty is an option for these patients. The procedure has a low procedural mortality and high efficacy in experienced centres but has not yet been subjected to rigorous evaluation in clinical trials. Alternative options for percutaneous management include atrial septostomy and pulmonary artery denervation. Experience with these procedures is accumulating, but adequately powered, controlled trials have not yet been performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muller et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: