Why the study?
Conventional right atrial appendage pacing increases atrial activation time and atrial tachyarrhythmia incidence, motivating evaluation of alternative pacing sites to optimize inter-atrial conduction.
Does pacing from the LRA or LAA compared to RAA or sinus rhythm improve total activation time of Bachmann's bundle in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does pacing from the LRA or LAA compared to RAA or sinus rhythm improve total activation time of Bachmann's bundle in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Pacing from the junction of the right atrium with the inferior caval vein significantly decreases total activation time of Bachmann's bundle compared to conventional right atrial appendage pacing, suggesting a rationale for individualized pacing sites.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Junctional pacing may shorten intraoperative conduction time; leaves open whether tailored atrial pacing improves postoperative outcomes.
AIMS: Conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing is associated with increased atrial activation time resulting in higher incidences of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Optimal pacing sites ideally shorten inter-atrial conduction delay, thereby decreasing atrial excitation time. We therefore examined the impact of programmed electrical stimulation (PES) from the right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA) on the electrophysiological properties of Bachmann's bundle (BB). METHODS AND RESULTS: High-resolution epicardial mapping of BB was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) and PES in 34 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Programmed electrical stimulation was performed from the RAA, junction of the RA with inferior caval vein (LRA), and left atrial appendage (LAA). Pacing from either the RAA or LAA resulted in, respectively, right- and left-sided conduction across BB. However, during LRA pacing in most patients (n = 15), activation started in the centre of BB. The total activation time (TAT) of BB during RAA pacing [63 (55-78) ms] was similar to that of SR [61 (52-68) ms, P = 0.464], while it decreased during LRA [45 (39-62) ms, P = 0.003] and increased during LAA pacing [67 (61-75) ms, P = 0.009]. Reduction of both conduction disorders and TAT was most often achieved during LRA pacing (N = 13), especially in patients who already had a higher amount of conduction disorders during SR [9.8 (7.3-12.3) vs. 4.5 (3.5-6.6)%, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Pacing from the LRA results in a remarkable decrease of TAT compared with pacing from the LAA or RAA. As the most optimal pacing site varies between patients, individualized positioning of the atrial pacing lead guided by mapping of BB may be one of the new frontiers for atrial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schie et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: