Key result
Cardiac stem cell therapy improves LVEF by ~11 percentage points vs. placebo after MI.
Meta-Analysis
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONALE: Cardiac stem cells (CSC) therapy has been clinically introduced for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction (MI). To date, there has been no systematic overview and meta-analysis of studies using CSC therapy for MI. OBJECTIVE: Here, we used meta-analysis to establish the overall effect of CSCs in preclinical studies and assessed translational differences between and within large and small animals in the CSC therapy field. In addition, we explored the effect of CSC type and other clinically relevant parameters on functional outcome to better predict and design future (pre)clinical studies using CSCs for MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search was performed, yielding 80 studies. We determined the overall effect of CSC therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction and performed meta-regression to investigate clinically relevant parameters. We also assessed the quality of included studies and possible bias. The overall effect observed in CSC-treated animals was 10.7% (95% confidence interval 9.4-12.1; P<0.001) improvement in ejection fraction compared with placebo controls. Interestingly, CSC therapy had a greater effect in small animals compared with large animals (P<0.001). Meta-regression indicated that cell type was a significant predictor for ejection fraction improvement in small animals. Minor publication bias was observed in small animal studies. CONCLUSIONS: CSC treatment resulted in significant improvement of ejection fraction in preclinical animal models of MI compared with placebo. There was a reduction in the magnitude of effect in large compared with small animal models. Although different CSC types have overlapping culture characteristics, we observed a significant difference in their effect in post-MI animal studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwetsloot et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial infarction (preclinical animal models). Cardiac stem cell (CSC) therapy vs. Placebo controls was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement (MD 10.7%, 95% CI 9.4-12.1, p=<0.001). Cardiac stem cell therapy improved left ventricular ejection fraction by 10.7% (95% CI 9.4-12.1; P<0.001) compared with placebo in preclinical animal models of MI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: