Why the study?
Abdominal aortic calcification is a strong predictor of CVD events, but whether adding AAC score to the Framingham risk score improves prediction of cardiac death in adults aged 40 years and older was unclear.
Does the addition of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) score to the Framingham risk score (FRS) improve the prediction of cardiac death in the general population aged ≥ 40 years?
Does the addition of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) score to the Framingham risk score (FRS) improve the prediction of cardiac death in the general population aged ≥ 40 years?
Adding abdominal aortic calcification scores to the Framingham risk score significantly improves the prediction of long-term cardiac death in the general population aged 40 years and older.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is considered as a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Our study aimed to investigate whether the predicted risk for cardiac death with the Framingham risk score (FRS) could be further improved with the addition of AAC score in general population aged ≥ 40 years. METHODS: A total of 2971 participants aged ≥ 40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2013-2014 were followed up. The Spearman's rank correlation was performed to explore the correlation between the AAC score and FRS. the Kaplan-Meier method was used to make cumulative cardiac death curve. Predictors of cardiac death was identified by multivariate Cox regression. Additionally, the predictive value of FRS alone and combined with AAC score was estimated by comparing the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and calculating Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). RESULTS: During a median of 70.50 months (interquartile range 58.43-82.57 months), 49 (1.649%) experienced cardiac death in the follow-up. The FRS was positively associated with AAC score. Both FRS and AAC score were independent predictors of cardiac death (hazard ratio 1.216; 95%CI 1.135 to 1.302; p < 0.00001; 1.159; 95%CI 1.109 to 1.211; p < 0.00001; respectively). Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated increased risk of cardiac death with increasing AAC score (log-rank 54.548, p<0.0001). The predictive value of FRS significantly was improved by adding with AAC score [increase in AUC from 0.734 to 0.780, p < 0.0001; IDI = 0.007, p = 0.013 ]. CONCLUSIONS: AAC score is positively related with Framingham index, and FBS adjusted by AAC score further improved the prediction risk for cardiac death in general population aged ≥ 40 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: