Why the study?
Does complete testosterone suppression therapy increase arterial stiffness in men with prostate cancer?
Does complete testosterone suppression therapy increase arterial stiffness in men with prostate cancer?
Testosterone suppression in men with prostate cancer is associated with increased aortic stiffness, suggesting a potential mechanism for increased cardiovascular risk.
Androgen depletion was associated with lower arterial compliance; hypothesis-generating for CV risk with testosterone suppression, needs prospective confirmation.
Low androgen levels in men are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, through unclear mechanisms. We measured arterial stiffness ('compliance') in 21 men receiving complete testosterone suppression therapy for prostate cancer, and in 25 controls. Systemic arterial compliance (SAC), which assesses proximal aortic stiffness, was calculated by simultaneous recording of aortic flow and carotid artery pressure (the 'area method'). Aorto-femoral (A-F), aorto-radial (A-R) and femoral-dorsalis pedis (F-DP) pulse-wave velocities (PWVs) were recorded using the 'Complior' system. SAC was significantly lower in the androgen-depleted men compared to controls (0.81 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.43 arbitrary compliance units, p = 0.01, mean +/- SD). Correspondingly, their A-F PWV was higher (14.1 (10.1-21.8) vs. 12.4 (9.6-17.4) m/s, p = 0.03, median (range)). Cases tended to be older (75 +/- 7 vs. 71 +/- 6 years, p = 0.07), and to have higher systolic blood pressure (148 +/- 22 vs. 143 +/- 17 mmHg, p = 0.40); however, SAC was still significantly lower (p = 0.03) after adjustment for age and stratification for central systolic pressure (< or = or > the median). Adjustment of A-F PWV for age and central systolic pressure reduced significance to p = 0.07. There was no significant difference in peripheral PWVs between groups. In conclusion, testosterone suppression is associated with increased aortic stiffness, only partly explained by age and blood pressure. Loss of androgens in men might therefore adversely affect cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dockery et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: