Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the association between the atherogenic index of plasma and stroke in a middle-aged and elderly population.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
13,027 participants aged 45 years above in China
Comparison
Quartiles of atherogenic index of plasma
Design
National cross-sectional study
AIP-stroke association in Chinese adults is hypothesis-generating; leaves open prospective validation before any risk-stratification role.
Objective: To investigate the association between atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and stroke. Methods: The 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) survey was used in this study. Logistic regression was adopted to examine the relationship between AIP, calculated as log (TG/HDL), and stroke. Subgroup analysis was used to further explore the associated factors. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression was adopted to estimate the non-linear association. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to calculate the cutoff value of AIP. Results: In this study, 13,027 participants aged 45 years above were enrolled. The odds ratios in the fully adjusted logistic model across the quartiles of AIP were 1.00 (reference), 1.09 (95% CI 0.69–1.72), 1.62 (95% CI 1.06–2.49), 1.07 (1.08–2.58), respectively. Non-linear association between AIP and stroke was not found using RCS regression (p for non-linearity > 0.05). The subgroup analyses showed that the association between AIP and stroke varied in different gender, alcohol and cigarette consumption, but the interaction effects were insignificant (all p > 0.05). The cutoff value of AIP was 0.82, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.57. Conclusion: Elevated AIP is significantly associated with the increased risk of stroke in the middle- aged and elderly Chinese, indicating that AIP may be a predictive factor for stroke among the Chinese middle-aged and elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: