Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hybrid trolleybuses (HTBs) with in-motion charging (IMC) can extend zero-emission service using existing catenary, but high on-wire charging powers may concentrate loads and accelerate battery aging. We present a data-driven simulation that replays recorded high-resolution Controller Area Network (CAN) logs through a per-vehicle electrical model with (Constant-Current/Constant-Voltage) (CC/CV) charging and a stress-map aging estimator, a configurable partial catenary overlay, and fleet aggregation by simple summation and an iterative node-voltage analysis of a resistor-network catenary model. A parameter sweep across battery sizes, upper state of charge (SoC) bounds, and charging power caps compares a minimal “charge-whenever-possible” policy with a per-vehicle lookahead (“oracle”) policy that spreads charging over available catenary time. Results show that lowering maximum charging power and/or the upper SoC bound reduces capacity fade, while energy-demand differences are small. Fleet load profiles are dominated by timetable-driven concurrency using 40 recorded days overlaid into one synthetic day: varying per-vehicle power or target SoC has little effect on peak demand; per-vehicle lookahead does not flatten the peak. The node-voltage analysis indicates catenary efficiency around 97% and fewer undervoltage events at lower charging powers. We conclude that per-vehicle policies can reduce battery stress, whereas peak shaving requires cooperative, fleet-level scheduling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleist et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: