Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serine protease inhibitors merit further development as antithrombotic options; leaves open their clinical role pending randomized trials.
Pathological activation of the hemostatic system, resulting in thromboembolic complications, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Unfractionated heparins and low-molecular-weight heparins, both suitable only for parenteral administration, as wall as vitamin K antagonists, represent the current cornerstone of antithrombetic therapy. Although orally active and very efficaclous, the latter class of drugs has a narrow therapeutic window and requires frequent monitoring. Due to their apparent pivotal role in the coagulation cascade, the serine proteases factor Xa and thrombin have attracted the greatest attention in thrombosis research. The recently launched fondaparinux, an antithrombin-III-dependent pentasaccharide and highly selective factor Xa inhibitor, has demonstrated impressive clinical results and may play an important role in the future. On the other hand, the search for low-mclecular-weight, orally active direct serine protease inhibitors has been the focus of intense research for more than a decade. However, only a very limited number of comounds are under late clinical development to date. The most advanced compound, the orally active, selective thrombin inbibitor ximelagatran, is in the preregistration phase for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Factor Vlla and factor IXa have gained less attention as pharmacological targets, factor Xla and factor Xlla play only a minor role in thrombosis research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ries et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: