Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The two enantiomeric forms: 1R,5R (R) and 1S,5S (S) of the Troeger's base analog, 9,19-methano-9,10,19,20-tetrahydrodiacridino-[b,f]-[1,5]- diazocine which possess a C2 axis of symmetry, are susceptible to interact differently with DNA. This paper reports the results of molecular modelling calculations on B DNA-Troeger's base complexes. Two interaction modes have been examined: intercalation and binding in the grooves. Into the limits of accuracy of such a kind of calculations, some tendencies seem to appear. In the intercalation mode, the R and S enantiomers exhibit a selectivity for alternating dinucleotidic sequences and the minor groove is enantioselective for S. Binding in the major groove is selective for S with G-C sequences, and in the minor groove the stereoselectivity appears for R with A-T sequences. The S-(dG-dC)5.(dG-dC)5 complex in the major groove seems to be the most favoured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coppel et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: