Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the critical risk of torsade de pointes from drug interactions involving CYP3A4 inhibitors and non-antiarrhythmic QT-prolonging drugs, emphasizing the need for preclinical screening.
Biotransformation of drugs is accomplished by phase I (P450 enzymes) and phase II metabolism (conjugation) predominantly in the small intestine and liver. As are most drugs, commercially available non-antiarrhythmic agents that have been reported to cause torsade de pointes are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes 3A4 and 2136. It is possible that polymorphisms and heritable variations in the activity of these isozymes place an individual administered select potassium channel blocking drugs at a genetic risk for the development of torsade de pointes. A more common scenario, however, is that drug interactions, usually involving agents such as erythromycin that block CYP3A4, have led to this form of proarrhythmia. In the recent past, a significant number of highly visible drug withdrawals have occurred (e.g. terfenadine, asthemizole, cisapride) all with a consistent theme: parent drugs that block the rapid component of the delayed rectifier given for non-life-threatening disorders and are metabolized by CYP3A4 have been linked to torsade de pointes and reports of death have ensued when the drug was combined with inhibitors of this isozyme (e.g. erythromycin, ketoconazole, grapefruit juice). Because of these situations and their resultant impact upon the health of the public, it seems prudent that all new entities under investigation (and their significant metabolites) be screened for the potential to cause torsade de pointes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerry L. Bauman (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: