Why the study?
What are the direct effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs (lidocaine, flecainide, disopyramide) on epicardial electrograms in dogs?
What are the direct effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs (lidocaine, flecainide, disopyramide) on epicardial electrograms in dogs?
Class I antiarrhythmic drugs have distinct direct effects on epicardial electrograms in dogs, with lidocaine primarily accelerating repolarization and flecainide decelerating conduction.
These canine electrogram effects should not guide human antiarrhythmic use; leaves open translation to clinical ventricular arrhythmias.
The effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs on epicardial electrograms during regular atrial pacing were investigated in anesthetized, open-chest dogs. Lidocaine, flecainide or disopyramide was infused selectively into the distal site of the left-anterior descending artery. Lidocaine produced a dose-dependent elevation of ST segment without changing the amplitude of R wave. Flecainide produced a dose-dependent increase of R-wave amplitude accompanied by the augmentation of negative T. The ST segment was elevated at the high dose. The QRST area did not change at the low dose but significantly increased at the high dose, indicating that the ST-T change at the low dose was secondary to changes in ventricular depolarization. The effects of disopyramide on R wave and ST segment were between those of lidocaine and flecainide. The major action of lidocaine was the acceleration of ventricular repolarization while that of flecainide was the deceleration of ventricular conduction. Disopyramide had an action that was intermediate between the two drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
WATANABE et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: