Why the study?
Does the combination of CEA measurement and cytological analysis in pericardial fluid improve the diagnostic accuracy for malignant pericarditis?
Does the combination of CEA measurement and cytological analysis in pericardial fluid improve the diagnostic accuracy for malignant pericarditis?
Combining CEA measurement with cytological examination of pericardial fluid maximizes diagnostic accuracy for malignant pericarditis.
May support combined CEA-cytology testing in pericardial fluid; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
The diagnostic accuracy of measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and of analysis of the cytological characteristics of pericardial fluid was assessed in 10 patients with benign pericarditis and 7 patients with malignant pericarditis. The mean CEA levels of pericardial fluid specimens from patients with malignant pericarditis were significantly higher than those from patients with benign pericarditis. However, a high CEA level was not seen in a specimen of pericardial fluid which contained nonepithelial tumor cells. Positive cytological findings were obtained in specimens of pericardial fluid from 85.7% of the patients with malignant pericarditis. Correct diagnosis of malignancy was made by CEA assay alone or by cytological examination alone in 85.7% of the patients examined, while a combination of these methods raised the diagnostic rate to 100%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tatsuta et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: