Key result
Pericardial fluid CEA levels were significantly higher in malignant compared to non-malignant effusions (median 80 vs 1.26 ng/ml, p<0.01), with CEA >5 ng/ml showing 73% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
Why the study?
Does the evaluation of CEA and NSE in pericardial fluid improve the recognition of malignant pericarditis?
Observational (n=36)
Does the evaluation of CEA and NSE in pericardial fluid improve the recognition of malignant pericarditis?
Simultaneous cytologic examination and CEA assessment in pericardial fluid improves the diagnostic yield for malignant pericarditis, whereas NSE measurement is of limited value.
Pericardial CEA may support malignant effusion diagnosis alongside cytology; leaves open incremental value and needs prospective validation before routine adoption.
This study was designed to assess the value of tumor marker evaluation in pericardial fluid for the recognition of malignant pericarditis. Thirty-six patients with signs and symptoms of large pericardial effusion entered the study. Pericardiocentesis with pericardial fluid drainage was performed in all of them. CEA and NSE levels were evaluated in the pericardial fluid and compared to pericardial fluid cytology. The median CEA value in malignant effusions was 80 ng/ml (range 0-305 ng/ml) and in non-malignant ones 1.26 ng/ml (range 0.2-18.4 ng/ml), p < 0.01. The sensitivity of CEA elevation above 5 ng/ml for the recognition of malignant pericarditis was 73% and the specificity was 90%. Pericardial fluid cytology was positive in 22 of 26 patients with malignant pericarditis (85%). CEA exceeding 5 ng/ml or positive cytology were seen in 96% of the patients with malignant pericarditis. The median NSE value in malignant pericardial effusions was 41.8 micrograms/l (range 2-172 micrograms/l) and in non-malignant ones 5.85 micrograms/l (range 1-83.9 micrograms/l), p < 0.3. For the differential diagnosis of large pericardial effusions we would recommend simultaneous cytologic examination of pericardial fluid and CEA assessment. NSE measurement in hemorrhagic pericardial fluid is of limited value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1998 study conducted an observational in Large pericardial effusion / Malignant pericarditis (n=36). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) evaluation vs. Non-malignant pericardial effusions was evaluated on Median CEA value in pericardial fluid (p=< 0.01). Pericardial fluid CEA levels were significantly higher in malignant compared to non-malignant effusions (median 80 vs 1.26 ng/ml, p<0.01), with CEA >5 ng/ml showing 73% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: